Microplastics have been found in the human brain for the first time, raising concerns over potential impacts on human health.
The tiny pieces of plastic are near-ubiquitous, even in places as remote as Antarctica, and scientists have also discovered them throughout the human body. Researchers have previously detected them in the lungs, heart, intestines, liver and placenta, as well as in semen and blood. Until now they have not been reported in a scientific journal as reaching the brain, which is protected by the blood-brain barrier.
However, a team at Sao Paulo University medical school has now found them in the brains of 8 of 15 deceased people who had lived in Sao Paulo, Brazil’s biggest city. The pieces of plastic, 5.5 micrometres and above in size, were found in the olfactory bulb, a small part of the brain that processes smell.
“This could have important implications regarding neurodegenerative diseases. We still don’t know, but we see an increasing prevalence of these diseases worldwide,” said Thais Mauad, who led the study.
The location in the brain has led her to speculate that people are breathing in the plastics through their nose. “When you breathe, there are neuron cells in your nasal cavity connected to the olfactory bulb. We thought maybe this could be the entry route,” said Mauad. Other studies in recent years have shown one type of air pollution, fine particulate matter called PM2.5, can reach the brain.
Scientists are still investigating what effect microplastics have on human health. One Italian team, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine earlier this year, found that patients with microplastic particles in their carotid arteries had a greater chance of a stroke than those who did not.
Infrared microscope images showing the presence of microplastics in the brain for the first time
DR THAIS MAUAD AND DR LUIS FERNANDO AMATO-LOURENCO/ UNIVERSITY OF SAO PAULO AND FREIE UNIVERSITY BERLIN
“I think that is the first strong evidence. There is also concern about neurological and psychiatric diseases, especially in the developing brain,” Mauad said.
Her research, published in the journal JAMA Open Network on Monday, used two methods to detect the microplastics. The team broke down some of the brains with an enzyme, leaving only non-biological material including the plastic. They also cut frozen slices of the brain and used infrared microscopes to spot the microplastics in situ.
The biggest challenge for the researchers was avoiding contamination of the brains with microplastics from clothing, gloves and other objects. “Nowadays, everything is plastic. So all these experiments had to be adapted,” said Mauad.
She was unable to say why not all 15 brains had microplastics present given the ubiquity of the particles, but said that it could simply be that they had failed to detect them. There was no particular link to the type of jobs the deceased had previously held.
Microplastics were also detected in the brain in a “preprint” last month, a study that has not yet undergone review by other experts and published in a scientific journal.
Dr Matthew Campen at the University of New Mexico, an author of the preprint, said that the microplastics in Mauad’s study were so large they had probably reached the olfactory bulb via the nose. “This new paper provides interesting evidence for microplastics exposure and potential entrance to the brain. Currently there is no data showing a clear link between micro or nanoplastics and neurological disease,” he said.
However, Campen said that scientists were worried about increased exposure to plastics. He thinks that the olfactory bulb could be evidence of our bodies protecting us, by depositing microplastics there rather than allowing them to travel to our lungs.
“We are in the phase of looking at whether microplastics are present. I think this phase is finishing because everywhere we look we find microplastics. Now we have entered the phase of saying does this microplastic cause any harm,” said Mauad.